Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
Begin forwarded message:
From: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>
Date: June 12, 2012 9:00:56 AM EDT
To: Victor Cuvo <vacuvo@yahoo.com>
Subject: U.S. Supreme Court Summaries for June 12, 2012
Reply-To: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>
If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add notifications@justia.info to your address book.
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.
Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.com
Practice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.Today on Verdict
Two More Nails in DOMA's Coffin: Courts Invalidate Federal Law's Rejection of Same-Sex Marriage
Justia columnist and Hofstra law professor Joanna Grossman comments on two recent rulings that invalidate applications of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which purports to reject same-sex marriages. Read Article
The First Day of the Trial of Former Penn State Assistant Coach and Second Mile Founder Jerry Sandusky for 52 Counts of Child Sex Abuse
Justia columnist and Cardozo law professor Marci Hamilton comments on the beginning of the trial of Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State assistant football coach and Second Mile founder who is accused of having sexually molested numerous boys who trusted him. Read Article
Daily Opinion Summaries
U.S. Supreme Court
Summaries for June 12, 2012
- Elgin v. Dept. of Treasury
Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law
Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia Elgin v. Dept. of Treasury
Docket: 11-45 Opinion Date: June 11, 2012 Judge: Thomas
Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law
Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., certain federal employees could obtain administrative and judicial review of specified adverse employment actions. At issue was whether the CSRA provided the exclusive avenue to judicial review when a qualifying employee challenged an adverse employment action by arguing that a federal statute was unconstitutional. The Court held that it did. The CSRA precluded district court jurisdiction over petitioners' claims because it was fairly discernible that Congress intended the statute's review scheme to provide the exclusive avenue to judicial review for covered employees who challenged covered adverse employment actions, even when those employees argued that a federal statute was unconstitutional.
http://j.st/miF 
View Case on: Justia Legal Information Institute Google Scholar
Forward to a Friend
Have friends who like law? Forward this email.
Find Us on Facebook
Like Justia and enjoy legal discussions on Facebook.
Follow Us on Twitter
Follow Justiacom for news and updates on Twitter.
Justia.com Free Legal Information Portal www.Justia.com Federal & State Case Law, Codes & Regs Law.Justia.com US Federal Case Filings & Dockets Dockets.Justia.com Daily Opinion Summaries Daily.Justia.com You received this email because you have subscribed to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries. You can subscribe to summaries for US Courts, including the US Supreme Court, all US Courts of Appeals and some US state courts.
Visit the Justia Daily Opinion Summaries page to add, edit or remove subscriptions.
If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at notifications@justia.info.
Unsubscribe From This Newsletter or unsubscribe vacuvo@yahoo.com immediately here. "Justia" is a registered trademark of Justia Inc.
Justia • Justia, Inc. 1380 Pear Ave Suite 2B Mountain View, CA 94043
Have a Happy Day! Hug the Pug © 2011, Justia Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment