Saturday, December 22, 2012

Spaghetti with Regulation Sauce

Spaghetti with Regulation Sauce

by KATE HAVARD, weeklystandard.com
December 31st 2012

Restaurant owners work overtime to figure out Obamacare.

The owner of an Italian restaurant in Baltimore was going to talk to me about how his business was preparing for Obamacare, now that it is going to be the law of the land. But seeing the backlash faced by other businessmen who dared to suggest the law might have a less than salubrious impact on their businesses, he was having second thoughts.

On the day after the election, Papa John's CEO John Schnatter got in trouble after speaking to a group of college students about small businesses. Asked whether he thought Papa John's franchise owners might "cut people's hours back.  .  . so they wouldn't have to pay for health insurance," Schnatter responded, "It's common sense. That's what I call lose-lose."

An honest, almost innocuous answer. Yet the media portrayed Schnatter as the Pizza Grinch, scheming to snatch health care from the hands of his struggling employees just before Christmas.

Liberal groups announced boycotts, the company's Facebook page comments were filled with ire, Jon Stewart called Schnatter and other CEOs critical of the health care law "a—holes" on TV.

A survey by YouGov seemed to indicate that Papa John's "brand index" had dropped in the days following the fray. The media liked the idea that a businessman was being punished for saying that an expensive health care law was going to be expensive. "Restaurant Brands Suffering After Obamacare Rants," read a headline in Slate. The Huffington Post piled on: "Papa John's Obamacare Stance Costs Company Its Reputation."

Schnatter stepped in to do damage control, writing an op-ed in which he assured readers that he intended to comply with the law and was indeed "cool with" people having health insurance.

Other businessmen who publicly speculated about the effects this law would have on their businesses, like The Cheesecake Factory CEO David Overton and Denny's franchise owner John Metz, also came under fire.

"That's not something you want to find out on December 31, 2013, and then have to implement it on January 1, 2014," says Michelle Reinke, a health care expert at the National Restaurant Association.

She says that throughout the regulatory public comment process, the association has requested flexibility with certain regulations, and hopes things will become clearer once the "guidance" hardens into rules. "Restaurant owners need to educate themselves about how the law will impact their business and their employees," she said. "But until all the rules are on the table, it's hard to make decisions about the future."

For businessmen like the Italian restaurant owner, the uncertainty is the crusher. He doesn't know yet whether he'll be in the over-50 or under-50 employees category, so all he can do is hunker down and try to collect his data. He doesn't know if he'll be able to afford the health insurance plan he currently has for his employees once more of his workers qualify (until now, he has counted 34 hours per week, not 30, as full time). Does he need to change plans? If he's not at the 50-employee mark, will he be able to afford covering any of his employees or have to drop health coverage altogether?

All of this remains unclear. There is something, however, that he knows for sure. In the 1990s, he grew the restaurant, tacking on a sprawling complex to the little bar and kitchen where his Italian immigrant parents served spaghetti and meatballs starting in the early 1950s. He doubled its size.

He also laid the groundwork for further expansion. "When we re-engineered this building, we left in place the structure to support a 120-seat catering hall on the second level," he says. Now, it's out of the question.

"I'd always thought I'd do what my dad did," he says. "He was working in here till he was 73 and had a massive heart attack and died."

Original Page: http://pocket.co/spjHH

Shared from Pocket

Pardon for pope's butler who stole papers expected

Pardon for pope's butler who stole papers expected

by NICOLE WINFIELD, bigstory.ap.org

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Benedict XVI on Saturday granted his former butler a Christmas pardon for stealing the pontiff's private papers and leaking them to a journalist, one of the gravest Vatican security breaches in recent times.

The pope met for 15 minutes with Paolo Gabriele in the prison where the ex-butler was serving his sentence for the theft. Gabriele was subsequently freed and returned to his Vatican City apartment where he lived with his wife and three children.

The Vatican said he would not continue living or working in the Vatican, but that it "intends to offer him the possibility to serenely restart his life together with his family."

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the pope's meeting with Gabriele was "intense" and "personal," noting that Gabriele and the pope had worked together closely for six years.

The pardon closes a painful and embarrassing chapter for the Vatican, capping a sensational, Hollywood-like scandal that exposed power struggles, intrigue and allegations of corruption and homosexual liaisons in the highest levels of the Catholic Church.

Gabriele, a 46-year-old father of three, was arrested May 23 after Vatican police found what they called an "enormous" stash of papal documents in his Vatican City apartment. He was convicted of aggravated theft by a Vatican tribunal on Oct. 6 and has been serving his 18-month sentence in the Vatican police barracks.

He told Vatican investigators he gave the documents to Italian journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi because he thought the 85-year-old pope wasn't being informed of the "evil and corruption" in the Vatican and thought that exposing it publicly would put the church back on the right track.

The publication of the leaked documents, first on Italian television then in Nuzzi's book "His Holiness: Pope Benedict XVI's Secret Papers" convulsed the Vatican all year, a devastating betrayal of the pope from within his papal family that exposed the unseemly side of the Catholic Church's governance.

Original Page: http://pocket.co/spjHV

Shared from Pocket

Tweet by @FoxNews via TweetCaster


Fox News (@FoxNews)
12/22/12, 6:46 AM

Ex-Marine Jon Hammar back on US soil after release from Mexico prison http://fxn.ws/12vLpNT

Shared via TweetCaster (http://tweetcaster.com)

Sunday, November 11, 2012

News.me | "The Obama machine understood both the closeness of the race and the power of his image"

email template

 

by Julie Moos Published Nov. 9, 2012 12:38 pm Slate's Julia Turner spoke with photojournalist Scout Tufankjian about the photo of Barack and Michelle Obama that has become the most retweeted ever . The photo was taken August 15 in Dubuque, Iowa, in the middle of a bus tour. "It was the first day that the first...
shared by @Poynter at 2:30 pm on Nov 11

View full story at http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/195005/photojournalist-explains-when-why-she-snapped-the-most-retweeted-photo-of-obamas/

via News.me, available in the App Store



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

BlogWatcher - Political correctness ousts FoxNews stalwart - CathNews

BlogWatcher - Political correctness ousts FoxNews stalwart - CathNews
http://www.cathnews.com/article.aspx?aeid=34093


BY MICHAEL MULLINS

Recently the (Catholic) University of San Diego rescinded its invitation to progressive British theologian Tina Beattie. Now the Jesuit president of Fordham University in New York has been tempted to do the same to notorious conservative Anne Coulter (pictured). He resisted, but the university's Republican students club – which invited Coulter – has since uninvited her anyway.

Coulter, a regular guest on FoxNews, is one of America's most famous and outspoken rigiht-wing commentators and proud haters ("I'm a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second"). 

Deacon's Bench has published the very eloquent explanation of the president, Fr Joseph McShane SJ, who says:

Her rhetoric is often hateful and needlessly provocative — more heat than light — and her message is aimed squarely at the darker side of our nature. As members of a Jesuit institution, we are called upon to deal with one another with civility and compassion. … Hate speech, name-calling, and incivility are completely at odds with the Jesuit ideals … Still, to prohibit Ms. Coulter from speaking at Fordham would be to do greater violence to the academy, and to the Jesuit tradition of fearless and robust engagement.

Fordham's Republican students clumsily claimed the upper hand in their statement – "had the President simply reached out to us before releasing his statement, he would have learned that the event was being cancelled" – but have nevertheless suffered a major loss of face among conservatives. Legal Insurrection says:

While I blame the Fordham administration first and foremost, it's time for College Republicans groups to grow a backbone.

Meanwhile Tina Beattie continues to defend her views, which she describes as faithful to "the demands of conscience, academic freedom and Catholic identity".

In Australia, Sentire Cum Ecclesia writes of his disappointment at missing our on a Year of Faith indulgence. Indulgences are being granted to those who visit the place of their baptism and renew their baptismal vows. Sentire is visiting Pinaroo, South Australia, where he was baptised in 1966. However Sentire is a convert from the Lutheran Church, and the Year of Faith indulgence applies only to baptisms in a Catholic Church.

I had assumed that the indulgence was connected to the action of visiting the place of your baptism. In fact, the indulgence is actually connected to the place itself, and hence the ruling.

David Timbs has some interesting historical background about indulgences.

A critical turning in the development of the Catholic culture of fear, dread and profound human worthlessness was occasioned by the outbreak of the great Plague or Black Death in 1347… An enduring legacy left by this catastrophe was a popular deep-seated fear of dying without sacramental absolution… The advent of the Plague delivered a cash cow into the hands of money strapped clerics. This new revenue source was called Indulgences.  

Back in the US, Brandon Vogt has listed "7 Things Bishops Should Know About Catholic Bloggers". The first is that "We are your friends, not your enemies". Perhaps the most interesting is the fifth: "Digital imprimaturs are not a good idea".

What about blogs and websites? Should we institute some form of digital imprimatur? I don't think so. I'm convinced it's a bad idea.

His reasons are that blogs are constantly changing, there are too many, and they are not libraries of digitised books. However he refers to the Vatican's purchase of the ".catholic" top level domain name, partly to guarantee Catholic internet users a place of doctrinal purity. Vogt does not exactly make the suggestion, but there is scope for awarding worthy bloggers a ".catholic" domain.

Finally, Standing on my Head guest blogger Fr Rutler writes on "Why I love the Corrupt and Crime Ridden Catholic Church".

The Catholic Church might be corrupt and crime ridden, but the Catholic Church is also the only institution that can do anything about it. Of course the Catholic Church is full of sinners. Just like a hospital is full of sick people. … We are all not happy with the crime and sin and corruption in the Catholic Church, but we can't imagine any other church that would be any different.

This puts into context the Chaser Hamster Wheel quote provided by Gerard Henderson as his anti-Catholic Sectarian award of the week.

Craig Reucassel: The Catholic Church has been dragged into the scandal surrounding the degrading initiation rituals at St John's College at Sydney Uni, which last year nearly killed a girl.

Julian Morrow: Yes. The Archbishop of Sydney, Archbishop Pell, has intervened, thankfully. He says it's the role of the Church, not the College, to abuse young people.

  


Michael MullinsMichael Mullins, founding editor of CathNews, compiles this 'Blog Watcher' column every week.

 

 

Disclaimer: CathBlog is an extension of CathNews story feedback. It is intended to promote discussion and debate among the subscribers to CathNews and the readers of the website. The opinions expressed in CathBlog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the members of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference or of Church Resources.


(via Instapaper)



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Veterans Day: When vets run afoul of the law, these courts care - CSMonitor.com

Veterans Day: When vets run afoul of the law, these courts care - CSMonitor.com
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2012/1111/Veterans-Day-When-vets-run-afoul-of-the-law-these-courts-care


By Anna Mulrine, Staff writer / November 11, 2012

In a downtown building that looks like a bunker, Judge Robert Russell Jr. ascends to the bench of his courtroom with a greeting that more closely resembles an Army cadence than a call to order.

Skip to next paragraph

Related stories

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

"Good afternoon!" Judge Russell says to those assembled before his bench.

"Good afternoon, Judge!" they yell back in robust unison.

Even on a typical day, this is not a typical courtroom. The Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court is the first of its kind in the nation – a court of law only for US military veterans who have run afoul of the law, and only for those willing to exchange jail time for a year of counseling, treatment, and tough love.

But this day is not about stern words and legal sentences. It begins with a graduation ceremony for those who have made it through. One receives a "challenge coin," to mark a job well done, and all receive a reminder "to be mindful of the people, places, and things that put us at risk."

Then Russell comes down off the bench to give them a hug.

"I'm going to stay straight," one graduate says. "No more drinking, no more gambling."

This Veterans Day, the Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court's program is being held up as a model. Of the 90 vets who have graduated, none has been rearrested, and the idea spawned in the municipal courts here is spreading. Built in the image of local drug courts or family courts, some 100 military veterans courts have been established in city courts nationwide, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. And the VA expects that number to double in the next year alone.

The need is clear. Across America, 1 in 10 criminals is a US military veteran, according to US Department of Justice statistics. Russell and others believe that these rates are closely tied to the experience of going to war.

A 2008 RAND Corp. study found that one-fifth of all US military service members who have returned from Iraq and Afghanistan report grappling with post-traumatic stress or major depression. Yet half of these former troops say they have never sought treatment, either for fear that it will harm their careers, or because they have trouble navigating the military medical bureaucracy.

Veterans courts and their emphasis on rehabilitation are designed to help fill that gap.

The goal is to "really project the VA's treatment capacity into the criminal justice system," says Sean Clark, the VA's national coordinator for Veterans Justice Outreach, which means "trying to catch veterans as early as possible in their 'justice careers,' if you will."

In Buffalo, one criminal in particular, brought into court on a drug offense, stuck in Russell's mind.

"When I asked him where he lived, he said, 'Well, Judge, I'm homeless.' That blew me away. How can a guy who served in Iraq come home and say, 'I'm homeless'? It was just uncon­scion­able to me."

Preventing homelessness is a primary aim, since adult male veterans who have been incarcerated are far more likely to be homeless, the VA's Mr. Clark says.

Though supported by the VA, veterans courts tend to be driven by individual judges and service members who see a need within their communities. In Buffalo, the vast majority of vets who walk through Russell's doors come on drug- and alcohol-related offenses.

"I started seeing vets from the most recent conflict – young people, 23 or 24," Russell says, recalling the events that led him to create his veterans court in January 2008. "They looked good physically – sharp, brush cut – but they were being arrested for different things."

And not all veteran offenders are cut out for veterans courts. By electing to go through the program, vets are agreeing to a rigorous 12-month program that includes intensive counseling, mentoring from fellow vets, frequent random drug tests, and job training.

Some drop out and opt for the "regular" court, in which they face jail time but none of the commitments of the rehabilitation program. Indeed, the 90 graduates of the Buffalo program represent only one-third of the 285 vets who have come before the court.

But for a former service member trying to rebuild his life, the veterans courts offer multiple benefits. When vets walk into the courtroom, they have immediate computer access to local VA officials, who can refer them to services such as counseling, benefits, or job training.

Related stories

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

"Many of the vets have claims that have been pending for years," says Jack O'Connor, the mentor coordinator for the Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court. "The vet's getting more done in his first day with the judge than he's gotten done with the VA in his whole life."

Moreover, they are watched over by the court's volunteer mentors, who are vets themselves, and will often go to great lengths to help their charges. They drive them to counseling appointments hours away, and help them line up interviews and find housing, for example.

"When we go to serve our country, sometimes we don't realize that the sacrifice continues when we come home," says Philip Ippolito, a military veteran and team leader for the court's mentors, choking back tears at the graduation ceremony. "And because of that sacrifice, we struggle."

Are the courts just for criminals?

When word of these services got out, however, it did not sit well with some vets, who asked whether they would have to commit a crime to have access to care that they had been seeking through the VA and the Pentagon's bureaucratic channels, sometimes for years.

One afternoon, a veteran came into the court yelling. He wanted to know why those who were arrested got immediate services, but he, as a law-abiding citizen, had seen his claim languish with the VA for years.

His aggressive loudness led him to be "immediately taken to the ground," says Mr. O'Connor. "But we all heard what he said."

In response, the Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court established what it calls its "line to the left." Anyone who wants help from a mentor of the court can come before the court and meet with them to get advice and help on their claim.

The mentors' dedication comes from a deep sympathy. They know what veterans in the program are going through, they say, because they have often struggled mightily themselves.

Mentors' dedication: They've been there

Trueman Muhrer was an Army private first class when he deployed to Iraq as part of the invasion.

On security for an explosive ordnance disposal unit, Mr. Muhrer was in the gun turret of his Humvee when it was hit by a roadside bomb. He spent four months in the hospital. His buddy, the assistant gunner in the passenger seat, was killed.

During his time in recovery, Muhrer saw "a lot of veterans going through struggles, just dealing with the system. There are a lot of places where people need an advocate."

People like Justin Smith, who was deployed to Iraq as a private first class at the height of the war as a gunner on Route Irish, widely known at the time as the most dangerous road in the world.

"We did patrols almost every day," Mr. Smith recalls.

After he returned from war, Smith felt angry and lost. "I knew I had a problem – my temper. I never really sleep," he says.

Then he found himself homeless. "Luckily, it was summertime. It was warm outside, so I could wander."

Then, in July 2011, Smith got into a high-speed chase with police. He could have been charged with a felony, but instead was referred to veterans court. "That basically kind of saved me," he says. "It was a relief – I was thinking I was going to be in jail for quite some time."

Mentors helped Smith apply for VA disabilities. "I didn't even know I was supposed to be receiving benefits for post-traumatic stress," he says.

Now he has a home, cares for his two young sons, and gets anger-management counseling. "I can buy a house – I can do almost anything I want."

The court and the camaraderie it provides create "a pretty welcoming environment," he adds, explaining that his mentor "told me about his symptoms, the stuff he dealt with – we went through the same stuff."

That said, he adds, "I always kind of feel alone anyways."

Russell's hope in starting the Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court was to tap into the culture of the US military in an effort to help turn around the lives of those who came into his courtroom.

Related stories

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

"Is there something we can do to take advantage of the military culture?" he wondered. "To capture that experience of discipline, integrity, pride – that team relationship?"

The veterans courts are an effort to create a structure for participants. But the court is no boot camp.

The key is to find mentors "who are sensitive enough not just to get in people's faces," he says. "Someone who's going to have a degree of empathy as a coach, as a motivator. It's not their role to be a disciplinarian. The court, if necessary, will do that."

The Buffalo court program has had to let mentors go in the past for being too overbearing: "I remember, one said: 'Forget the VA – you need to get yourself together and be a man,' " O'Connor says. "What … kind of a statement is that?"

In other cases, O'Connor says he lost mentors when he asked them to do too much. "I remember we had one guy spend the entire day at the VA, helping to get [other people's] benefits ironed out. You know what happened? He quit."

The Buffalo mentor program, with 40 members, raises its own funds separately from the court system. The money buys challenge coins issued at graduation, gas money, and bus passes for participants to get to their court appearances.

The results, the mentors say, speak for themselves: No graduate has been rearrested, O'Connor notes.

"There is disbelief that the program is this good," he says.

Yet O'Connor and others acknowledge a wider criticism: Why do veterans deserve such special treatment?

In the beginning, "some people didn't like the idea of the vets courts," he says. "They thought we were doing way too much for vets – the word 'boutique' was thrown around a lot."

The rapid proliferation of veterans courts raises some legal questions as well, says Michael McDaniel, a retired lieutenant general in the Michigan National Guard and associate professor at Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Ann Arbor, Mich.

"There are a couple of really interesting issues from a public policy standpoint," Mr. McDaniel says. "When you get the judicial branch involved, it says, 'Equal protection under the law.' " This means, he says, that there have to be "some limits on veterans' treatment courts."

Should, for example, veterans treatment courts be limited only to service members who have committed misdemeanors, or should the courts be available to admitted felons as well?

Deciding who qualifies

And if there is some assumption that combat stress arising out of the wounds of war is the reason former troops are committing crimes, then should courts be available only to those who served in combat?

On this point, courts across the country differ. In Michigan, veterans courts are open only to those who have served on active duty.

But Russell and the mentors of the Buffalo court feel differently. "Combat or no combat doesn't affect us if you've signed that line that says, 'Here's a blank check to Uncle Sam payable up to and including your life,' " says Frank Grillo, an Iraq war vet and court mentor who served three combat tours in Iraq "in the worst possible areas."

"What if you're support to combat? What if you're the person who's caretaker to bodies when they come home? What if I'm in a training exercise before I'm deployed and get injured?" says Russell. "When you start splitting hairs, then do you start investigating and analyzing: Where were you? Were you close to the front? What we do know is that they signed an oath to defend their country."

And that, says O'Connor, "is the vets' mentality," both in the Buffalo court and in the rapidly growing numbers of veterans courts throughout the country: a combination of "leave no soldier behind," he says, and "There but for the grace of God go I."


(via Instapaper)



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Tweet from WSJ Video (@WSJVideo)

WSJ Video (@WSJVideo)
View footage of #explosion and #fire that blasted #Indianapolis neighborhood last night. #indy on.wsj.com/SVfd24

Download the official Twitter app here


Sent from my iPhone