Thursday, May 31, 2012

Unique Vatican court system tackles petty to serious crimes

Unique Vatican court system tackles petty to serious crimes

catholicnews.com | Nov 30th -0001
By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- From picked pockets to a 1998 double murder and suicide, the Vatican legal system has dealt with a vast array of crimes and misdemeanors over the decades.

Now it has begun a formal inquiry into the case of the pope's personal assistant who has been implicated in the media-blitzed "VatiLeaks" scandal. Paolo Gabriele, the pope's valet since 2006, was arrested May 23 by Vatican security for having unauthorized documents in his possession.

As the case unfolds in the coming weeks, many may wonder how the Vatican City State's unique judicial system works.

Its legal foundations are rooted in the Code of Canon Law, papal decrees, the Lateran Pacts, and Italian and Roman municipal laws.

Of the half-dozen different tribunal systems at the Vatican, just one deals specifically with the maintenance of law and order in the 108-acre country. The other systems tackle ecclesial matters.

When Vatican City State was created out of the Lateran Pacts in 1929, it adopted the Italian legal system for very practical reasons. Since the majority of people who are brought before the court are Italian residents, not Vatican citizens, it was believed necessary to have an established point of reference and direct link to Italian authorities.

Like the Italian system, the Vatican judicial system is an inverted pyramid. At the bottom level is the sole judge, Piero Antonio Bonnet, then there's a three-judge tribunal, followed by an appeals court and the supreme court of appeals at the top.

Lay lawyers and judges staff the bottom two courts while the appeals court includes clerics. The supreme court of appeals is led by three cardinals, and U.S. Cardinal Raymond L. Burke is president.

The Lateran Pacts established that anyone who commits a crime on Vatican property, even if it is a Vatican employee, can be handed over to Italian authorities and be tried in Italian court.

The treaty also stipulated that crimes committed in St. Peter's Square, an open area that borders on Italian territory, fall to the Italian police. That is why Italians took over the investigation and trial of Blessed John Paul II's would-be assassin, Mehmet Ali Agca, when he shot the pope in 1981.

The Vatican legal system has modified some aspects of the Italian system it's based on. For example, it only uses civil laws that do not conflict with Catholic teaching, especially those concerning divorce and abortion.

It also fixed some of the problems that plague the Italian system -- like the glacial speed with which it addresses and resolves cases.

The Vatican has sped things up by decriminalizing a series of minor offences -- such as shoplifting in Vatican stores -- which allows the sole judge to resolve them without having to go to trial.

Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, told reporters that in the case of Gabriele, the first phase of a preliminary investigation was completed by a Vatican tribunal judge, Nicola Picardi.

Bonnet, the sole judge, began the next step of the formal investigation, which will include a preliminary questioning of the suspect in the presence of his two lawyers and Vatican judge Picardi.

The next stage of the investigation will be to decide whether the evidence points to a possible criminal offense, in which case Gabriele would be called to stand trial. If the evidence does not indicate criminal action, he would be acquitted.

If they decide to go to trial, the court could also decide whether to turn to the Italian justice system for assistance, Father Lombardi said.

Even though no cardinals have been questioned in the initial inquiry, "hypothetically speaking," it is unlikely that a cardinal could be interrogated by the Vatican magistrates, the spokesman said.

"Cardinals answer to the pope," he said. "With anything involving a cardinal, the Holy Father would have to be informed and decide how to proceed."

The last serious crime the court and its judges had to deal with was a 10-month investigation in 1998 that determined a young Swiss Guard shot and killed the Guard's commander and the commander's wife before taking his own life.

The cases that normally come across the sole judge's desk include contested parking tickets, civil suits involving compensation for injuries suffered at the Vatican, employee theft, forgery, and the especially rare instances of small-time fraud or embezzlement.

The vast majority of penal cases handled by the court involve theft, especially by pickpockets, but the perpetrators usually are not caught.

Per capita, Vatican City has the highest crime rate in the world.

According to the most recent published statistics, 226 criminal cases were reported in 2011 -- actually half the number of cases reported in 2006 when it was almost one crime per resident in a country with only 492 inhabitants.

But those figures are deceiving since the high crime rate stems from the sheer volume of people -- some 18 million each year-- that stream through the Vatican to visit St. Peter's Basilica and the Vatican Museums.

Recent reforms in Vatican norms and laws -- for instance, the 2008 creation of an agency regulating and overseeing workers' health and safety -- also have increased the number of civil suits, which counted 640 in 2011.

The Vatican also adopted new laws in 2011 as part of its efforts to meet international norms against money-laundering and financing terrorism.

END

Original Page: http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1202244.htm

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Holder to black pastors: Civil rights at risk

Holder to black pastors: Civil rights at risk

by Joel Gehrke, campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com
May 30th 2012 11:13 AM

Attorney General Eric Holder, speaking to black pastors at a Congressional Black Caucus event designed to get out the vote this election year, warned his audience that the civil rights they enjoy are under attack.

"I've heard a consistent drumbeat of concern from citizens, who -- often for the first time in their lives -- now have reason to believe that . . . some of the achievements that defined the civil rights movement could now hang in the balance," Holder said in his prepared remarks. He cited "the all-too-common deceptive practices we've been fighting for years"  in addition to "more recent fears and frustrations about some of the state-level voting law changes we've seen this legislative season."

Holder went on to criticize the South Carolina voter ID law, which Democrats often portray as an act of Republican racism designed to hurt President Obama by disenfranchising black voters.

Holder was a guest of the CBC at the event, which CBC chair Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., explained yesterday is designed to educate pastors on what they're allowed to say about politics in church while encouraging them to keep black turnout high.

"President Obama is going to get 95 percent of the [African American] vote," Cleaver said on MSNBC yesterday, after explaining, "We want to let them know that there is a theological responsibility to participate in the political process, at least in the Judeo-Christian tradition."

Without mentioning party affiliation, Holder praised the -- until recently exclusively Democratic -- Congressional Black Caucus as the "conscience of Congress" over the last four decades

He also told the pastors that they are "stewards of democracy," in keeping with Cleaver's call for pastors to help drive voter turnout. "You have a thoughtful voice to add to discussions about voting access -- what the struggle for freedom has long been about ensuring: the opportunity for citizens to voice their opinions, and -- through the casting of their ballots -- to signal their priorities and shape their futures," Holder concluded.

Original Page: http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/holder-black-pastors-civil-rights-risk/569991

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Fwd: Georgia Supreme Court Summaries for May 31, 2012



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Begin forwarded message:

From: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>
Date: May 31, 2012 9:02:53 AM EDT
To: Victor Cuvo <vacuvo@yahoo.com>
Subject: Georgia Supreme Court Summaries for May 31, 2012
Reply-To: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>

If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add notifications@justia.info to your address book.
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.

Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.com

Practice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.

Today on Verdict

Marci A. Hamilton

Notre Dame Sues the Federal Government in Order to Avoid Providing Reproductive Services to Its Female Students and Employees

Justia columnist and Cardozo law professor Marci Hamilton comments on Notre Dame University's and other Roman Catholic organizations' recent suit against the federal government over federal executive regulations requiring the University and the other organizations to include contraception, abortion, and sterilization in their healthcare plans. Read Article

Daily Opinion Summaries

Georgia Supreme Court

Summaries for May 31, 2012
Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia Subscribe Now to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries

Whitaker v. State

Docket: S12A0640 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Carley

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Defendant was found guilty of felony murder and cruelty to children. The trial court entered judgment of conviction for the felony murder and sentenced defendant to life imprisonment. The cruelty to children charge merged with the felony murder convictions. Defendant subsequently appealed the denial of his motion for a new trial. The court held that defendant made an insufficient showing of prejudice and thus his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must fail and defendant's due process rights were not violated by the 10-year delay between trial and appeal. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.

http://j.st/WWG View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

West Hamryka, et al. v. City of Dawsonville, et al.

Docket: S12A0215, S12A0217, S12A0218 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Nahmias

Areas of Law: Real Estate & Property Law, Zoning, Planning & Land Use

Appellants, owners of a tract of real property in Dawson County, filed a nine-count complaint against appellees challenging a rezoning decision in superior court. The superior court granted summary judgment to appellees on three of the nine counts and appellants subsequently filed three direct appeals to the court. The court initially dismissed the appeals by order for failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA 5-6-35. On appellants' motion for reconsideration, however, the court reinstated the appeals and directed the parties to brief whether OCGA 5-6-35(a)(1) applied. Having had the benefit of full briefing and oral argument on the issue, the court concluded that these appeals came under OCGA 5-6-35(a)(1) and so the court dismissed them again.

http://j.st/WWJ View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

Walden v. State

Docket: S12A0014 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Hunstein

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Defendant pled guilty to felony murder in connection with the arson that caused his stepfather's death. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court denied. The court found that the plea was voluntary and held that defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was not properly before the court on direct appeal because it was not raised below.

http://j.st/WPv View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

Sharpe v. State

Docket: S12A0677 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Thompson

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Defendant was convicted of malice murder in connection with the deaths of two victims. Defendant's amended motion for new trial was denied and defendant subsequently appealed. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; the trial court did not err in allowing a medical examiner to characterize the manner of death for the two victims; the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding exculpatory evidence when it refused to admit a 911 call defendant made to report the fire; any error as to the felony arson charge did not affect the outcome of the proceedings; and the court rejected defendant's claim that the trial court's charge to the jury failed to inform them that the "not guilty" option could operate as a general acquittal of the murder charges. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.

http://j.st/WPV View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

Scott v. State

Docket: S12A0764 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Thompson

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Defendant was convicted of felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in connection with a shooting death. On appeal, defendant contended that the trial court erred by excluding from trial evidence that the victim had been molesting defendant's niece and refusing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter. The court held that it was error not to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense under the circumstances and the court could not say the error was harmless. Accordingly, the court reversed the judgment.

http://j.st/WPe View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

Rucker v. State

Docket: S12A0495 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Hines

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Defendant appealed his convictions for two counts of malice murder in connection with the fatal shootings of two victims, one count of kidnapping with bodily injury as the result of the abduction and rape of a third victim, and one count of kidnapping resulting from the abduction of a fourth victim. The court held that the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence photographs of videotapes labeled with violent content which were found in one of the two vehicles in which defendant and his family were attempting to flee at the time of his arrest, in response to defendant's insanity defense; the trial court did not err in permitting into evidence photographs of tattoos on his body taken after he was in custody in response to defendant's insanity defense; and even assuming that a prosecutorial comment raised the specter of defendant's dangerousness in the future, it was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.

http://j.st/WPd View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar

Royal Capital Dev., LLC v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Docket: S12Q0209 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Thompson

Areas of Law: Contracts, Insurance Law, Real Estate & Property Law

The United States Court of appeals asked the court to answer a question that stemmed from a dispute over the proper interpretation under Georgia law of a contract insuring real property. The primary issue presented was whether the court's ruling in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mabry, a case involving an automobile insurance policy wherein the court held that a provision requiring the insurer to pay for loss to the insured's car required the insurer to also pay for any diminution in value of the repaired vehicle, was applicable. The court held that its ruling in Mabry was not limited by the type of property insured, but rather spoke generally to the measure of damages an insurer was obligated to pay.

http://j.st/WPN View Case
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar
Forward this email to a Friend
Forward to a Friend

Have friends who like law? Forward this email.

Like Justia on Facebook
Find Us on Facebook

Like Justia and enjoy legal discussions on Facebook.

Follow Justiacom on Twitter
Follow Us on Twitter

Follow Justiacom for news and updates on Twitter.

Justia.com Free Legal Information Portal www.Justia.com
Federal & State Case Law, Codes & Regs Law.Justia.com
US Federal Case Filings & Dockets Dockets.Justia.com
Daily Opinion Summaries Daily.Justia.com

You received this email because you have subscribed to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries. You can subscribe to summaries for US Courts, including the US Supreme Court, all US Courts of Appeals and some US state courts.

Visit the Justia Daily Opinion Summaries page to add, edit or remove subscriptions.

If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at notifications@justia.info.

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter or unsubscribe vacuvo@yahoo.com immediately here.

"Justia" is a registered trademark of Justia Inc.
Justia • Justia, Inc. 1380 Pear Ave Suite 2B Mountain View, CA 94043

Have a Happy Day! Hug the Pug © 2011, Justia Inc.

Former Supreme Court Justice Stevens says second thoughts likely in Citizens United



Former Supreme Court Justice Stevens says second thoughts likely in Citizens United
FOX NEWS POLITICS | MAY 31, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/9ND7f


Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said Wednesday night he expects that the court has already had second thoughts about parts of its ... Read more

--
Sent via Pulse/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Russian jet's flight recorder found in Indonesia



Russian jet's flight recorder found in Indonesia
USATODAY.COM | MAY 31, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/9OldO


JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) — Villagers have found the flight data recorder from a Russian passenger jet that slammed into a jungle-clad cliff atop an Ind... Read more

--
Sent via Pulse/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



2 dead, 3 injured in Indianapolis shooting



2 dead, 3 injured in Indianapolis shooting
USATODAY.COM | MAY 31, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/9Ob6i


Investigators have no clear idea of what led a man to go on a shooting rampage on the northeast side of Indianapolis, leaving one victim and himself d... Read more

--
Sent via Pulse/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Steve Spurrier wants players paid



Steve Spurrier wants players paid
ESPN HEADLINES | MAY 30, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/9NrEm
Steve Spurrier's idea to give football players an extra stipend had little traction at last year's SEC spring meetings, but that didn't stop him from... Read more

--
Sent via Pulse/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Halladay sidelined on The Sporting News

Halladay sidelined: http://tablet.sportingnews.com/2012-05-30/mlb-halladay-sidelined.html


Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

A sad new low for Terrell Owens - NFC East Blog - ESPN

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/39572/a-sad-new-low-for-terrell-owens


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)

Michael Vick Sued Over Breach of $100,000 Contract | The Philly Post

http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2012/05/29/michael-vick-sued-breach-100000-contract/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)

U.S. Supreme Court Summaries for May 30, 2012



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Begin forwarded message:

From: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>
Date: May 30, 2012 8:00:51 AM CDT
To: Victor Cuvo <vacuvo@yahoo.com>
Subject: U.S. Supreme Court Summaries for May 30, 2012
Reply-To: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries <notifications@justia.info>

If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add notifications@justia.info to your address book.
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.

Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.com

Practice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.

Today on Verdict

Sherry F. Colb

Some Reflections on the Texas Pre-Abortion Ultrasound Law, a Year After Its Passage: Part One in a Two-Part Series of Columns

Justia columnist and Cornell law professor Sherry Colb considers the constitutionality of the Texas law enacted about a year ago that requires abortion providers to (1) perform an ultrasound on a patient seeking an abortion; (2) expose the patient to the resulting visual ultrasound image, as well as any extant fetal heart sounds; and (3) provide an explanation of the embryo or fetus as pictured on the screen. Read Article

Daily Opinion Summaries

U.S. Supreme Court

Summaries for May 30, 2012
Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia Subscribe Now to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries

RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank

Docket: 11-166 Opinion Date: May 29, 2012

Judge: Scalia

Areas of Law: Banking, Bankruptcy

Debtors obtained a secured loan from an investment fund, for which the Bank served as trustee. Debtors ultimately became insolvent, seeking relief under 11 U.S.C. 1129(b)(2)(A), where debtors sought to confirm a "cramdown" bankruptcy plan over the Bank's objection. The Bankruptcy Court denied debtors' request, concluding that the auction procedures did not comply with section 1129(b)(2)(A)'s requirements for cramdown plans and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. The Court held that debtors could not obtain confirmation of a Chapter 11 cramdown plan that provided for the sale of collateral free and clear of the Bank's lien, but did not permit the Bank to credit-bid at the sale. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

http://j.st/WgV View Case
View Case on: Justia  Legal Information Institute  Google Scholar
Forward this email to a Friend
Forward to a Friend

Have friends who like law? Forward this email.

Like Justia on Facebook
Find Us on Facebook

Like Justia and enjoy legal discussions on Facebook.

Follow Justiacom on Twitter
Follow Us on Twitter

Follow Justiacom for news and updates on Twitter.

Justia.com Free Legal Information Portal www.Justia.com
Federal & State Case Law, Codes & Regs Law.Justia.com
US Federal Case Filings & Dockets Dockets.Justia.com
Daily Opinion Summaries Daily.Justia.com

You received this email because you have subscribed to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries. You can subscribe to summaries for US Courts, including the US Supreme Court, all US Courts of Appeals and some US state courts.

Visit the Justia Daily Opinion Summaries page to add, edit or remove subscriptions.

If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at notifications@justia.info.

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter or unsubscribe vacuvo@yahoo.com immediately here.

"Justia" is a registered trademark of Justia Inc.
Justia • Justia, Inc. 1380 Pear Ave Suite 2B Mountain View, CA 94043

Have a Happy Day! Hug the Pug © 2011, Justia Inc.

Police: DeKalb sergeant ‘boisterous' before arrest

Police: DeKalb sergeant 'boisterous' before arrest

by Marcus K. Garner, ajc.com
May 29th 2012

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

DeKalb County police Sgt. Jerry Banks was boisterous and disobedient last week when police detectives told him to leave the home of a woman they called his girlfriend, according to police reports.

DeKalb detectives were at the home of Cherise McMoore after she waved a gun and threatened to beat up a neighbor when Banks arrived with McMoore and tried to prevent their investigation, police said.

"[Banks] did knowingly and willfully obstruct or hinder … a law enforcement officer in the lawful discharge of the officer's official duties," said a warrant for the police sergeant's arrest, obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Banks, a nearly 14-year veteran with DeKalb police, and McMoore were arrested Friday morning at her home near Lithonia. He was charged with misdemeanor obstruction, and she was charged with making terroristic threats to a woman living near her, a felony.

According to McMoore's arrest warrant, last Tuesday she brandished a chrome handgun in the air at a neighbor and threatened to "whoop her [butt]."

Friday, Banks "refused to comply with verbal commands to leave the property while a search warrant was being executed on his girlfriend's residence," the arrest warrant said.

He was released early Friday evening on $500 bond. McMoore was released Monday on $3,500 bond.

Banks previously was in the news after his wife was attacked outside their home in the early hours of May 13, police said. Investigators are still seeking the assailant and have said they do not consider Banks, who was inside the home at the time, a suspect.

According to jail and court records, Banks was arrested in 1997 on simple and family battery allegations, but the charges were dismissed.

McMoore, 33, has had several previous arrests for trespassing and theft by taking, according to court documents. Those cases appear to be unresolved.

Banks has been placed on paid administrative leave pending the resolution of his criminal case, DeKalb police spokeswoman Mekka Parish said.

Original Page: http://www.ajc.com/news/dekalb/police-dekalb-sergeant-boisterous-1448799.html?cxtype=rss_news_81960

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Victims of Brutal War Rejoice at Taylor Sentencing

Victims of Brutal War Rejoice at Taylor Sentencing

by ANDY DRAKE and JONATHAN PAYE-LAYLEH Associate, abcnews.go.com
November 30th -0001

Amputees who are still struggling to lead normal lives years after they were mutilated by the rebels backed by ex-Liberian President Charles Taylor, hailed the decision by judges at The Hague on Wednesday to sentence him to 50 years in prison.

In a landmark ruling by the Special Court on Sierra Leone last month, the 64-year-old Taylor became the first former head of state since the aftermath of World War II to be convicted. He is to spend the next half-century behind bars on 11 counts for aiding and abetting the Revolutionary United Front rebels in Sierra Leone, who murdered and mutilated tens of thousands of people during their country's brutal civil war which ended in 2002.

"He has done bad things to us," said 22-year-old amputee Sento Thoronka of Taylor, as she attempted to cut weeds this weekend before the verdict using only her right arm. Her left arm was hacked off by the RUF, a common terror tactic by the group, which was backed by Taylor, in return for blood diamonds.

"There is nothing someone can say to me that will ever make me forget what he did, because when I look at myself I look odd. I'll never feel fine about that," she said.

Taylor is an ex-warlord whose rebel forces invaded Liberia in 1989, marking the start of that country's vicious civil war. He eventually ran and was elected president, before being forced out by another rebel group. In Liberia, which shares a border with Sierra Leone, the irony has always been that Taylor is being tried for crimes he aided and abetted, rather than the ones that he is accused of directly carrying out in his own country.

In the Liberian capital of Monrovia, Suzanah Vaye watched the proceedings and hailed the sentence. Her husband was killed during the last days of Taylor's government in 2003. He was last seen in the hands of the ex-president's security force.

"Martin Luther King, Jr. once said that justice in one place is justice everywhere," said Vaye. "Had Taylor not been so cruel to his own people here, he would not have taken it elsewhere. Today, I join Sierra Leoneans in saying this should be a lesson to people that God has his own way of bringing judgment ... Let this be a lesson to leaders that no one is bigger than God."

But Taylor also remains popular in Liberia among his former supporters, and among his extended family.

"The sentence is outrageous," said Arthur Saye, Taylor's brother-in-law, in Monrovia. "How can you give a man fifty years for only aiding and abetting."

———

Associated Press writer Jonathan Paye-Layleh contributed to this report from Monrovia, Liberia.

Original Page: http://abcnews.go.com/International/t/story/victims-brutal-war-rejoice-taylor-sentencing-16456815

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

WikiLeaks founder Assange loses appeal against extradition to Sweden

WikiLeaks founder Assange loses appeal against extradition to Sweden

foxnews.com | May 30th 2012

LONDON – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday lost his legal fight at Britain's Supreme Court against extradition to Sweden.

The London court announced its judgement in a hearing at around 9:15am local time.

The 40-year-old Australian is wanted in Sweden to face questioning over alleged sex crimes against two women.

He has now exhausted all his legal options in Britain, but could still make a last-ditch appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

Assange lodged his appeal against extradition with the Supreme Court in February, with his lawyers arguing the European arrest warrant used to seek his extradition was not valid as the Swedish prosecutor did not have sufficient authority to order the extradition.

This was rejected by a majority of five to two by the Supreme Court justices.

Attorneys for Assange secured a two-week stay however, arguing the decision by the judges was based on a point of law that was not discussed in court. Dinah Rose QC said the majority of members of the Supreme Court panel had made their decision based on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties -- which was never brought up at the time. She may decide to challenge the validity of Wednesday's ruling on that basis.

Assange will not be extradited until that two-week period is completed.

Once in Sweden, he would then be tried behind closed doors as rape trials in the country are held in "secret."

Assange fears that if he is sent to Sweden he will then be extradited to the US for prosecution over charges associated with his WikiLeaks website, which released hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic cables that revealed a mass of US secrets.

Original Page: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/30/wikileaks-founder-assange-to-be-extradited-to-sweden-after-uk-court-rejects/

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Nat Fraser trial: Guilty again of wife Arlene's murder in 1998

Nat Fraser trial: Guilty again of wife Arlene's murder in 1998

bbc.co.uk | May 30th 2012
30 May 2012 Last updated at 07:12 ET

Nat Fraser trial: Guilty again of wife Arlene's murder in 1998

Nat Fraser has always denied murdering his wife Arlene back in 1998 Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

Nat Fraser has been found guilty for the second time of murdering his estranged wife Arlene in 1998.

Fraser, 53, denied being behind the disappearance of his 33-year-old wife from Elgin, Moray.

He was previously found guilty in 2003 and jailed for life, but started a long appeal process which finally saw his conviction quashed last year.

A retrial then took place at the High Court in Edinburgh, lasting for six weeks.

Mrs Fraser was last seen on 28 April, 1998, after waving her two children off to school.

The trial heard claims Fraser's motive was that his wife was leaving him, and that she had seen a lawyer about getting a pay-off.

Fraser claimed that if his wife was murdered, the man responsible could be Hector Dick, who gave evidence for the prosecution.

Advocate depute Alex Prentice QC, prosecuting, said in his closing speech that Fraser had "instigated and organised" his wife's murder.

However, John Scott QC, defending, said the case was "blighted by hindsight and assumption" and argued much of the Crown evidence was "unreliable".

Original Page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-18247944#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Mental illness may play role in Patz case

Mental illness may play role in Patz case

by JENNIFER PELTZ, csmonitor.com
May 29th 2012

Enlarge

Pedro Hernandez has confessed to killing the 6-year-old boy at the heart of one of the nation's most prominent missing-child cases, police say. And he has schizophrenia and a history of hallucinations, his lawyer says.

Related stories

Court-appointed doctors are still assessing Hernandez's mental state, and it's unclear how much it will factor in the case charging him with the 1979 murder of young Etan Patz.

But if his psychiatric record becomes an issue, he'll encounter a justice system that seeks to strike a balance between recognizing mental illness and holding people responsible for their actions — a balance that has shifted back and forth over more than a century and a half.

MORE STORIES: Justice

Hernandez, 51, remained in a psychiatric hospital Tuesday as authorities continued trying to flesh out his startling admission in a case that galvanized the movement to publicize the problem of missing children. Meanwhile, Etan's father made clear that the attention to the case since Hernandez's arrest last week had taken a toll, telling reporters they had "managed to make a difficult situation even worse."

"It is past time for you to leave me, my family and my neighbors alone," Stan Patz said in a note posted on his apartment building's door.

Police encountered Hernandez, who worked in a nearby convenience store, shortly after Etan vanished on his way to school on May 25, 1979. But investigators never considered Hernandez a suspect until a tipster pointed them his way this month, saying he had made incriminating statements. He responded with an emotional and gruesome confession: He said he strangled the boy, hid his body in a bag and a box and dumped it near some trash, police said.

His statements launched police and the Manhattan district attorney's office into a complex process of building a 33-year-old case with, so far, no physical evidence.

And it has started the courts on a parallel path of exploring Hernandez's mental health. After defense lawyer Harvey Fishbein told a judge that Hernandez was schizophrenic, bipolar, had had visual and auditory hallucinations, and had been on psychiatric medication for some time, the judge ordered an examination to see whether he was mentally fit to stand trial.

The results aren't yet known, and the judge may ultimately hold a hearing to decide whether Hernandez can go to trial. If not, he would be sent to a psychiatric hospital and evaluated periodically to see whether he had improved enough to go to court.

Such exams aim to assess whether someone is well enough to participate in a trial and aid his or her own defense. They are separate from an insanity defense, which revolves around the defendant's psychological state at the time of the alleged crime.

In New York and many other states, defendants have to prove they were so mentally ill that they didn't know what they were doing was wrong. If successful, they are sent to psychiatric hospitals until judged well enough for release, if ever.

Fishbein declined to comment Tuesday on whether he might pursue an insanity defense. It could be challenging to portray Hernandez's mindset so long ago, potentially involving digging up decades-old medical records, tapping friends' and relatives' memories of his behavior at the time, or both.

"The closer you can bring his mental health and treatment issues to the time of the crime, the more plausible it becomes that he was suffering from mental disorder at the earlier time," said Stephen J. Morse, a University of Pennsylvania law and psychiatry professor who's not involved in the case.

Insanity defenses are venerable — they date to a case in 1840s England — and all but a handful of U.S. states allow them. But they are rare. They are offered in less than 1 percent of felony cases nationwide and successful only about 20 percent of the time, according to Richard E. Redding, a professor at Orange, Calif.-based Chapman University School of Law.

Among the hundreds of thousands of criminal cases closed in New York state each year, an average of only about 40 end with either an insanity acquittal or both sides agreeing on an insanity plea, according to state statistics. That statistic might not capture some insanity acquittals that get reported simply as acquittals.

Legal standards for insanity defenses nationwide have loosened and tightened at points over the decades, with a significant tightening after John Hinckley Jr. successfully offered an insanity defense in the 1981 shooting of President Ronald Reagan. Many states stopped allowing insanity defenses for conduct people knew was wrong but couldn't control, among other changes.

Instead of an insanity defense, Hernandez could invoke psychiatric problems to say his confession wasn't valid or voluntary, notes Bryan Konoski, a New York criminal defense lawyer who has worked on insanity defenses. He isn't involved in Hernandez's case.

"One of the psychiatric issues you really have in this case is whether his confession is a false confession," Konoski said.

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly has said Hernandez gave specific details that convinced investigators his confession was true. He also told people long ago that he had "done something bad" and killed a child in New York City, according to the commissioner.

One of Hernandez's sisters, Norma Hernandez, said Tuesday that she went to police in Camden, N.J., years ago to report a rumor that he had confessed at a prayer group. Camden police declined to comment on her remarks.

Kelly said Tuesday that detectives were speaking to Hernandez's siblings and members of the prayer group — and listening judiciously.

"Any high-profile case, you have to be careful, because people come out of the woodwork and make all sorts of claims and statements," the commissioner said.

Hernandez hasn't been linked to any other missing children's investigations, but Kelly said investigators aren't ruling anything out.

Original Page: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0529/Mental-illness-may-play-role-in-Patz-case

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

'Bin Laden doctor' jailed for militant link, says court

'Bin Laden doctor' jailed for militant link, says court

bbc.co.uk | May 30th 2012
30 May 2012 Last updated at 07:27 ET

'Bin Laden doctor' jailed for militant link, says court

Shakil Afridi's conviction has increased strains in relations between the US and Pakistan Continue reading the main story

A Pakistani doctor was jailed last week for alleged links to a banned militant group - not for helping the CIA to track down Osama Bin Laden, the text of the trial court's judgement shows.

The BBC's Orla Guerin says the papers add a bizarre twist to the case.

It was originally thought that Shakil Afridi had been imprisoned for running a fake vaccination programme to gather information for US intelligence.

Dr Afridi was jailed for 33 years by the tribal court in a closed hearing.

His family have said the treason charges against him are baseless.

The text of the judgement - released on Wednesday - shows that Dr Afridi was convicted for providing support and medical treatment to members of the militant group, Lashkar-e-Islam.

The judgement says there is also evidence that he was involved with foreign intelligence agencies, and this should now be considered by other courts.

Dr Afridi was tried for treason in a controversial hearing behind closed dooors under Pakistan's tribal justice system.

Our correspondent says that whatever the official reason for his conviction, many in Pakistan will believe that Dr Afridi was jailed for helping the CIA locate Osama Bin Laden.

There is some speculation that Wednesday's release of the judgment - which will almost certainly be the subject of a legal appeal by Dr Afridi's lawyers - may have been done under pressure from Washington.

On Friday a US Senate panel cut $33m (£21m) in aid to Pakistan in response to the jailing - $1m for every year of his sentence.

US officials say Dr Afridi was instrumental in tracking down the al-Qaeda leader and have called for his release.

It is not clear if any DNA from Bin Laden or any family members was ever obtained, or whether the doctor even knew the identity of the target.

His conviction has added to strains in US-Pakistani relations, already under pressure because of continuing US drone strikes in Pakistan and because of Islamabad's refusal to re-open overland Nato supply routes through Pakistan to Afghanistan. The routes were shut down in November since a US airstrike killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border.

Meanwhile, Dr Afridi's brother, Jamil, has told the BBC that he is concerned for his safety and the safety of his brother.

He said government officials had previously warned relatives to keep quiet because it could endanger Dr Afridi's life.

Bin Laden was killed by US forces in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in May 2011.

His presence in Pakistan embarrassed Islamabad, which argued that the covert US operation was a violation of its sovereignty.

Original Page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18262360#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Cruz into a Runoff

Cruz into a Runoff

by Katrina Trinko, nationalreview.com
May 30th 2012 5:00 AM

It was never going to be easy for Ted Cruz to force a runoff in the Texas Senate primary.

"This race is Ground Zero between the moderate establishment and the conservative tidal wave," Cruz said Tuesday at a Houston polling site, according to the Houston Chronicle. "The stakes are high."

"A runoff," he added, "would be a tremendous victory."

Last night, the former Texas solicitor general got his wish, winning a spot in the runoff and a direct showdown with Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, who finished just short of the 50-percent-plus-one threshold he needed to avoid a runoff.

Throughout the course of the campaign, Cruz faced serious hurdles, including Dewhurst's higher name-recognition levels and superior connections to the political establishment. He also faced a financial gap: While Cruz has proved to be a stellar fundraiser, he does not have the means to lend millions to his campaign from his personal coffers as Dewhurst did, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Advertisement

'); //]]> "David Dewhurst is a four-time statewide elected official, first as land commissioner in '98 and then three times as lieutenant governor," says Cal Jillson, a professor of political science at Southern Methodist University. "He is very well-known statewide. He's got a fundraising network that goes across the state and a personal wealth north of $200 million, which he's tapped into already."

"It's pretty difficult to introduce yourself to a state the size of Texas as a first-time candidate," Jillson adds. In Indiana's GOP primary, he notes, both candidates had won statewide office previously. "Mourdock was a statewide elected official whom people had seen on the ballot before and knew, so all he had to do was say, 'I have the credentials that would allow you comfortably to replace Lugar with me. He's been around too long. You know me. I'm a conservative.'"

Cruz's runoff-eligible second-place finish last night came despite some tough negative ads from Dewhurst, including a radio ad in the last few days suggesting that Cruz, who is Hispanic, supported amnesty. Cruz denounced the ad, stressing that he did not support amnesty. His campaign blasted out a statement from prominent Republican (and eldest son of former Florida governor Jeb Bush) George P. Bush calling the Dewhurst ad an example of "the type of divisive racial politics used by President Obama and the Democrats."

Cruz's success in wooing the grassroots — something he did relentlessly, crisscrossing the state and showing up at straw polls — certainly boosted him. But his second-place finish is also due to other factors, including winning key endorsements and lucking out in the late timing of the election. The rise of Tom Leppert, the Dallas mayor who came in third, likely helped. So did the endorsement from the Club for Growth, and the organization's decision to spend around $2 million on the race.

Endorsements proved significant. Sarah Palin's endorsement, which proved to be a booster for Richard Mourdock in Indiana and Deb Fischer in Nebraska, gave new energy to the Cruz candidacy. It also helped Cruz successfully combat a negative ad run by a pro-Dewhurst super PAC.

"When Cruz says he's a conservative, he has Sarah Palin backing him up. And for a certain segment of the Republican-primary electorate here in Texas, that means something," says Mark P. Jones, a political-science professor at Rice University. Referencing that pro-Dewhurst super PAC's ad, which included the line "Ted Cruz, a conservative? You've got to be kidding," Jones points out that Palin's endorsement undercut that ad. "In a lot of the broadcasts we've had here, that's running right after this Cruz 'Fighter' ad, where at the end Sarah Palin endorses him. The Palin endorsement is undermining the next ad, because if you're a voter, you're saying, 'Sarah Palin just endorsed him. Okay, but here's the Dewhurst attack ad saying that he's not a conservative. So either the Dewhurst ad is wrong or Sarah Palin's wrong. But both of them can't be correct.'"

"In the end, among a lot of movement conservatives, the Palin ad really helped to counter or at least neutralize a lot of the Dewhurst attacks," Jones says. "Sarah Palin was a much more valuable endorsement for Ted Cruz than Rick Perry was for David Dewhurst."

Also likely helping Cruz was the endorsement from Ron Paul. Republican Texas strategist Matt Mackowiak, who supports Cruz but is unaffiliated with his campaign, speculates that that endorsement could have been the difference between Dewhurst in the high 40s "or Dewhurst at 52."

Timing, too, worked to Cruz's advantage. At one point, today's primary was scheduled for March 6. If it had remained on that date, Mackowiak notes, there would likely have been higher turnout, with the presidential primary not decided. That higher turnout would have likely hurt, not helped, Cruz. Furthermore, the delay gave Cruz more time to raise money and campaign. "What I think Cruz did best was he really looked at the insurgent victories that candidates had last cycle and he tried to emulate them, take the best parts of each of them, and adapt them to Texas.

"He's worked like a dog," Mackowiak continues, mentioning the miles logged and the fundraisers held. Cruz, he notes, also faced constant pessimism, with people telling him that he "can't win, [voters] can't elect someone who hasn't run before, [he hasn't] waited [his] turn, Dewhurst has so much money."

Against all that, says Mackowiak, Cruz has "just kept the faith" and kept campaigning. If he wants to win the runoff in July, he'll have to rely on that same strategy succeeding once again.

Original Page: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/301260/cruz-runoff-katrina-trinko

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Rodman to be sentenced on 4 counts



Rodman to be sentenced on 4 counts
PULSE SPORTS | MAY 29, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/9KNGi


Flamboyant former NBA star Dennis Rodman is due in family court Tuesday to be sentenced on four counts of contempt for failing to pay child support. ... Read more

--
Sent via Pulse/


Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Justices Reject Appeal Seeking Payments for Ex-Iran Hostages

Justices Reject Appeal Seeking Payments for Ex-Iran Hostages

by MATTHEW L. WALD, nytimes.com
May 29th 2012

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the last legal appeal for former American hostages seeking compensation for their captivity in Iran three decades ago, leaving legislation newly introduced in Congress as the last chance to resolve their longstanding grievance.

A lower court, acting at the request of the State Department, previously blocked the hostages' effort to win compensation from Iran, holding that the agreement under which they were released barred such claims. The former hostages had sued under a 1996 law that they argued allowed them to seek damages, and in August 2001 they won a judgment of liability, because Iran did not appear in court to defend itself. But the State Department argued that its ability to conduct foreign policy would be compromised if damages were awarded.

The Supreme Court, as is its custom, did not give a reason for its decision on Tuesday.

Fifty-two Americans were held hostage for 444 days after Iranian radicals seized the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979.

"I would never have thought when I was getting kicked around in Iran that my own government would ever go to court to stop me," said David M. Roeder, a retired Air Force colonel who was the named plaintiff in the case. But after 12 years of legal wrangling, he said he was not surprised by the outcome.

"It's not just this administration or Clinton or even the Bush administration; there seems to be some sort of a weird hands-off-Iran policy," he said.

The approximately 100 people named in the suit, which included former hostages and some of their survivors, were seeking $10,000 a day, or $4.4 million each. According to their lawyers, money that was deposited in the United States by Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi of Iran before he was forced from power and then frozen by the Carter administration after the hostages were taken is still available.

Mr. Roeder and the other plaintiffs are hopeful that Congress will act again. On May 17, Representative Bruce Braley, an Iowa Democrat, and Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican who is chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced legislation that would double the fines against companies that are caught doing business with Iran. Half of the money would be used to compensate the former hostages. The bill would also let the president use frozen Iranian assets.

Mr. Braley, in a telephone interview, said that the court decision contradicted the Third Geneva Convention, which, he said, "prohibits us from absolving other countries of liability for engaging in the torture of U.S. citizens."

He did not say how much money he thought would be raised by doubling the fines for violating anti-Iran sanctions, but he said, "Any revenue is going to be a lot more than these hostages have received during the long period of time they've been waiting for justice." Mr. Braley's district includes the residence of one former hostage, Kathryn L. Koob. Mr. Braley said he would seek support from other lawmakers who represented districts where former hostages lived.

Original Page: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/30/us/politics/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-former-iran-hostagess.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shared from Pocket



Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Texas Senate Race: Tale of the IE Tape

Texas Senate Race: Tale of the IE Tape

by Sean Sulliv, hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com
May 29th 2012

As you watch tonight's Texas Republican Senate primary returns, here's a handy reference for outside group independent expenditure spending on the race. Groups allied with frontrunning Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst lead the way:

Pro-Dewhurst

Conservative Renewal PAC: $754,000
Texas Conservatives Fund: $2.26 million

Total: $3.01 million

Pro-Ted Cruz

Club For Growth: $1.41 million
Senate Conservatives Fund: $519,000
FreedomWorks: $108,000
Tea Party Express: $39,000

Total: $2.08 million

Pro-Craig James

Real Street Conservatives PAC: $120,000

Total: $120,000

Original Page: http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/05/texas-senate-ra-1.php

Shared from Pocket



Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Article: Egypt's presidential election: The count begins


Egypt's presidential election: The count begins
http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2012/05/egypts-presidential-election

Sent via Flipboard, your social magazine for iPad and iPhone.




Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
1.888.355.4983 (fax)



Justices Reject Appeal Seeking Payments for Ex-Iran Hostages

Justices Reject Appeal Seeking Payments for Ex-Iran Hostages

by MATTHEW L. WALD, nytimes.com
May 29th 2012

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the last legal appeal for former American hostages seeking compensation for their captivity in Iran three decades ago, leaving legislation newly introduced in Congress as the last chance to resolve their longstanding grievance.

A lower court, acting at the request of the State Department, previously blocked the hostages' effort to win compensation from Iran, holding that the agreement under which they were released barred such claims. The former hostages had sued under a 1996 law that they argued allowed them to seek damages, and in August 2001 they won a judgment of liability, because Iran did not appear in court to defend itself. But the State Department argued that its ability to conduct foreign policy would be compromised if damages were awarded.

The Supreme Court, as is its custom, did not give a reason for its decision on Tuesday.

Fifty-two Americans were held hostage for 444 days after Iranian radicals seized the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979.

"I would never have thought when I was getting kicked around in Iran that my own government would ever go to court to stop me," said David M. Roeder, a retired Air Force colonel who was the named plaintiff in the case. But after 12 years of legal wrangling, he said he was not surprised by the outcome.

"It's not just this administration or Clinton or even the Bush administration; there seems to be some sort of a weird hands-off-Iran policy," he said.

The approximately 100 people named in the suit, which included former hostages and some of their survivors, were seeking $10,000 a day, or $4.4 million each. According to their lawyers, money that was deposited in the United States by Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi of Iran before he was forced from power and then frozen by the Carter administration after the hostages were taken is still available.

Mr. Roeder and the other plaintiffs are hopeful that Congress will act again. On May 17, Representative Bruce Braley, an Iowa Democrat, and Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican who is chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced legislation that would double the fines against companies that are caught doing business with Iran. Half of the money would be used to compensate the former hostages. The bill would also let the president use frozen Iranian assets.

Mr. Braley, in a telephone interview, said that the court decision contradicted the Third Geneva Convention, which, he said, "prohibits us from absolving other countries of liability for engaging in the torture of U.S. citizens."

He did not say how much money he thought would be raised by doubling the fines for violating anti-Iran sanctions, but he said, "Any revenue is going to be a lot more than these hostages have received during the long period of time they've been waiting for justice." Mr. Braley's district includes the residence of one former hostage, Kathryn L. Koob. Mr. Braley said he would seek support from other lawmakers who represented districts where former hostages lived.

Original Page: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/30/us/politics/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-former-iran-hostagess.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)

Donald Trump steals limelight from Romney campaign

Donald Trump steals limelight from Romney campaign

by Seema Meht, feeds.latimes.com
May 29th 2012

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney walks off of his campaign plane past Donald Trump's plane after landing at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada. )

LAS VEGAS — Tuesday should have been a milestone moment for Mitt Romney -- after a primary battle that went on longer than nearly everyone expected, he was poised to finally clinch the GOP nomination. And he tried to turn the page on attacks by Democrats over his record as the head of a private equity firm by unveiling a new argument that President Obama is hostile to business.

But then came the Donald.

Romney was scheduled to raise as much as $2 million with Donald Trump at two events Tuesday evening, but his public schedule was designed to avoid highlighting his relationship with the controversial mogul, who continues to espouse disproven theories that Obama was not born in the United States.

That was a challenge from the moment Romney landed at Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport. As Romney's chartered plane taxied down the runway, a private plane emblazoned with Trump's surname sat parked near the terminal. Romney's staffers tried to move photographers and reporters into a position where they could not see Trump's shining-black aircraft as Romney alighted from his plane. They were not successful, and the first images of Romney arriving in Las Vegas and quickly beamed around the nation showed Trump's plane over his shoulder.

Things went downhill from there. Shortly before Romney's public rally with Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval and Rep. Joe Heck, Trump went on CNN and continued to argue to Wolf Blitzer that notices of Obama's birth published in two Hawaii newspapers in 1961 were false and that the long-form birth certificate that Hawaii produced was also not legitimate.

"Now, you won't report it, Wolf, but many people do not think it was authentic," Trump said. "His mother was not in the hospital. There are many other things that came out. And, frankly, if you would report it accurately, I think you would probably get better ratings than you're getting, which are pretty small."

The combative exchange went on for a few minutes, with Trump repeatedly arguing there were "many" people that disputed the document's authenticity, but declining to name any when Blitzer pressed him. He also said the Hawaiian governor who released the certificate was a Democrat when in fact she is a Republican.

Trump also gave interviews to CNBC and the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The matter has long been considered settled by most mainstream Republicans, and pundits of all stripes have questioned the wisdom of Romney associating with Trump, especially as he pivots to the general-election and tries to woo moderate voters. George Will, a conservative columnist, called Trump a "bloviating ignoramus"' on Sunday on CBS' "This Week."

Romney, who has long said that he believes the president was born in the United States, commented about the matter when asked by reporters aboard his plane on Monday.

"I don't agree with all the people who support me and my guess is they don't all agree with everything I believe in," he said. "But I need to get 50.1% or more and I'm appreciative to have the help of a lot of good people."

Tuesday was not the first time Romney's campaign has struggled to manage relations with Trump. When the host of the television show "The Apprentice" planned to stage a debate just days before the Iowa caucuses, Romney respectfully declined, saying his schedule was full. When Trump endorsed Romney in February, the announcement lasted mere minutes, neither man took questions and the campaign downplayed the nod.

But Trump being Trump, he wandered his casino resort just off the Las Vegas Strip, expounding about his thoughts on Romney and the presidential campaign to reporters at length before and after the event, while Romney retreated behind a curtain.

Original Page: http://feeds.latimes.com/~r/latimes/news/politics/~3/VgkU23Tn3bg/la-pn-donald-trump-steals-limelight-from-romney-campaign-20120529,0,2903672.story

Shared from Pocket



Victor Cuvo, Attorney at Law
770.582.9904
(sent from new iPad)